Navigating the path between playing NCAA hockey or Major Junior is a crucial decision all hockey players must face in their careers at a young age. Although this choice needs to be tailored to the individual’s unique circumstances, our goal with this post is to apply a set of principles to follow when making the decision.
Player’s Developmental Timelines
The essential factor influencing the decision between CHL and NCAA lies in the player’s developmental pace. Generally speaking, players who develop later in their careers are considered late bloomers. For those requiring more time to reach their peak, the NCAA offers a more forgiving timeline, allowing for gradual progression and refinement of skills. Major Junior is typically only worth it if you play before the age of 18. Those who only play Major Junior at a later age typically don’t get good enough pro or USports offers that make this option worth their time. On the other hand, elite players from a young age typically benefit by playing Major Junior as early as possible, where they will develop at the highest level to eventually play pro, and will often get excellent USports financial packages if they value education. That being said, there are exceptions for elite players, especially if the player values education and/or specific NCAA programs.
Academic Considerations & Future Ambitions
Looking beyond the ice, considerations about future career aspirations play a significant role. For players with professional hockey dreams or alternate career ambitions that do not necessitate a college degree, the decision towards the Major Junior option (if you’re good enough) makes the most sense. The NCAA, with its academic requirements, requires players to maintain a certain GPA each season in order to be eligible to play, so attending an NCAA program doesn’t make sense if you don’t value education. For players who could easily play Major Junior at a young age, but who also value education, the decision between NCAA & USports becomes an important one to consider. Typically, NCAA offers a better overall experience, but at this point, a player and family must weigh their various options and pick their program on a financial, academic, and athletic basis.
Which path produces more NHL & pro players?
In recent years, the trend of NHL drafts has seen a shift, with an increasing number of top picks emerging from the NCAA, attributed to the extended period for development and maturation the league offers. This trend underscores the NCAA’s growing reputation as a cradle for professional talent. That being said, Major Junior and pro leagues still currently produce the majority of NHL players.
Concluding Thoughts
The path to realizing one’s potential in hockey is not linear. It demands a comprehensive evaluation of one’s skills, developmental timelines, academic inclination, and future aspirations. For those standing at this crossroad, the best advice is to keep the above principles in mind when making your decision, and to reach out to an expert to discuss the pros and cons if you aren’t sure about the best path forward.
Watch our video breaking down this topic here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqybEFj7CvY
Need help finding an NCAA, Jr. A, or Prep team, and you want expert guidance now? Click the link below to speak with an advisor for free today.
